In Heard’s post-trial motions, her legal team alleged that the jury panel list released before the trial included an individual listed as born in 1945, making them 77 years old, but that voter registration information also listed a 52-year-old with the same last name living at the older person’s address. According to the documents, “The person who presented for jury duty with that name was clearly the younger one.” “Thus, the 52-year-old…sitting on the jury for six weeks was never summoned for jury duty on April 11.”
It appears that Juror Number. The filing stated that 15 wasn’t the actual individual listed on the jury panel. According to the filing, “Ms. Heard had her due process compromised.” These circumstances warrant a mistrial to be declared and a new trial should be ordered.
CelebHomes News reached Out to Heard for Comment, but didn’t hear back.